Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump's Bid to Dismiss Capitol Riot Lawsuits; Implications for Trump, Capitol Police, and Others

 

The federal appeals court's decision to deny former President Donald Trump's bid to dismiss civil claims against him stemming from the January 6th Capitol riot has significant implications for potential legal action against Trump and others involved in the events leading up to and during the attack.

Implications for Trump

The court's decision effectively removes Trump's shield of presidential immunity, opening him up to potential liability for his actions surrounding the Capitol riot. This means that the civil lawsuits against Trump can proceed, and he could be held accountable for any damages caused by his actions or incitement.

Implications for Capitol Police

The court's decision also clears the way for Capitol Police officers to sue Trump and others for the injuries and trauma they suffered during the riot. The officers' claims are based on the argument that Trump's actions incited the violence and thus created a foreseeable risk of harm to them.

Implications for Others Involved in the Riot

The court's ruling could also have implications for other individuals who were involved in the Capitol riot. For instance, it could strengthen the legal arguments against rioters who are facing criminal charges. Additionally, it could encourage other potential plaintiffs, such as members of Congress or the media, to come forward with civil claims against Trump and others.

Overall Impact

The federal appeals court's decision is a significant development in the ongoing legal fallout from the January 6th Capitol riot. It could pave the way for Trump and others to be held accountable for their actions, and it could provide a measure of justice for those who were harmed in the attack.

Unlikely Buddha 

Dec. 1,  2023