The Copenhagen interpretation and the Many-Worlds theory of Quantum Mechanics. What's the difference?

Quantum mechanics is the branch of physics that studies the behavior of matter and energy at the subatomic level. But when it comes to understanding this strange and puzzling world, there are two competing theories: the Copenhagen interpretation and the Many-Worlds theory.

Many scientists, including the world-renowned physicist Albert Einstein, were skeptical of quantum mechanics when it first emerged. They believed that the theory was incomplete and that there had to be more to the picture. Yet two interpretations of the theory have emerged, and both theories provide answers to some of the most profound questions in physics. 

The first theory is the Copenhagen interpretation, named after the famous 1920s Solvay Conference held in Copenhagen. This interpretation posits that a particle's behavior is not deterministic and is instead determined when it is observed. So, until an observer observes a particle, the particle exists in a state of superposition where it can exist in multiple states at the same time.

According to the Copenhagen view, an observer's observation of the particle will disturb the system, collapsing it from the superposition state into a single state for observation. Therefore, the observer's act of measurement changes the particle's outcome.

The second competitor is the Many-Worlds theory, also known as the Everett interpretation. This interpretation suggests that every possible outcome or state that a subatomic particle can exist in exists in parallel universes. In the Many-Worlds theory, the universe splits off into multiple parallel universes when a particle encounters a probable state.

Under this theory, when we make an observation, we collapse into one of the parallel universes, and all others continue to exist. Therefore, the Many-Worlds theory posits that there is no probabilistic nature ascribed to the act of measurement.

Now, the main difference between these two theories comes down to the interpretation of observation and measurement. While the Copenhagen theory posits that the observer and the act of measurement collapse the system, the Many-Worlds theory argues that the observer's interpretation is determined by which universe we find ourselves.

Both Copenhagen and Many-Worlds theories have their merits and continue to be tested and debated among physicists. The theories may sound bizarre, but they provide profound insights into the nature of quantum mechanics and the mysteries of the subatomic world. Regardless of which you believe, these theories remain compelling topics of discussion and inspiration for new research.

-Unlikely Buddha ©2023